I may have shared this on Canvas, but here it is on my blog! It's just an introduction and summary of an article on a controversial topic in my field.
For
my field (language education), a very controversial topic deals with what the
best way to educate young immigrant students. Some purport that
English-only is the best strategy, so that students are immersed in their new
language and learn it almost as native speakers. Others cite evidence that
many of these students feel stigmatized, frustrated, and end out less
academically successful than ones who learned academic skills in their native
language. However, bilingual education also comes in many forms.
Transitional bilingual education, maintenance bilingual education, dual
language immersion... and I believe there are others as well.
An article
on this controversial topic is by Stephen Krashen, entitled "What
Works: Reviewing the latest evidence on bilingual education"
deals with this topic. If you can't click on that link, check out this
URL: http://users.rcn.com/crawj/langpol/Krashen-McField.pdf
Krashen cites multiple meta-analyses
of the research on different bilingual models, and shares the conclusion that
bilingual education students succeed at greater rates than students in
English-only programs. Krashen notes that the different investigations found
limited evidence for one superior program among the different varieties of
bilingual programs, but mentioned that one analysis suggested that late-exit
bilingual programs proved more effective than other programs that send students
out earlier.
This article and the author are interesting to me, but I
think for a speech I may choose a different article that provides a little more
evidence and nuance in the analysis.